Evaluation of some physico-chemical properties of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite solutions

Published originally in: GUERISOLI, D.M.Z.; SILVA, R.S.; PÉCORA, J.D. Evaluation of some physico-chemical properties of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite solutions. Braz. Endod. J. 3(2): 21-3, 1998.

Esta página em Português


Danilo Mathias Zanello Guerisoli
FAPESP Fellow, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

Reginaldo Santana da Silva
Chemical Technician, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

Jesus Djalma Pécora
Chairman of the Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo
Av. do Café s/n
Ribeirão Preto, SP
Brazil
14040-904


Abstract

In this study, some physico-chemical properties (density, surface tension, pH, viscosity, wetting capacity and conductivity) of sodium hypochlorite solutions at the concentrations of 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 5.0% were evaluated. It was found that density, pH, viscosity, wetting capacity and conductivity of the solutions are directly proportional to their concentration of sodium hypochlorite. Surface tension values did not show significant differences between the solutions.

Introduction

Since its introduction to Dentistry in 1917 by BARRET1, sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) has proven to be efficient as a root canal irrigating solution due to its properties as tissue solvent, deodorant and bactericide (GROSSMAN and MAIMAN5, SHIH et al.12, BAUMGARTNER and CUENIN2). Although variations may occur regarding the concentration of this solution, the active principle remains the same (COHEN and BURNS3, DE DEUS4, LEONARDO and LEAL7).

For maximum efficiency, the shelf-life of these solutions must be observed, since the chlorine loss is rapid (PÉCORA et al.8, PISKIN and TÜRKÜN10, JOHNSON and REMEIKIS6).

Undoubtedly, sodium hypochlorite is the most used irrigating solution in the instrumentation of root canals worldwide. Due to the lack of information about the properties of these solutions, some physico-chemical properties (density, surface tension, pH, viscosity, wetting capacity and conductivity) of sodium hypochlorite solutions, at concentrations of 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 5.0% were studied in this investigation.

Materials and Methods

The chlorine concentrations of the hypochlorite solutions at 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 5.0% were evaluated by titration, iodometry method.

The densities of the solutions were obtained by the relation between mass and weight, using an electronic analytical balance (CG-Libror model 3200 H) and a graduated measuring glass (100 ml, Pyrex).

To determine the surface tension of the solutions, a tensiometer (Fischer Scientific, Surface Tensiomat 21) was used.

pH was measured with a pH meter (Digimed, DMPH-2).

The viscosity values were obtained using an Ostwald viscometer, based on the flow time of a liquid from a bulb through a capillary when subjected to its own weight. The flow time of the solution was compared with the time of a known viscosity liquid (water), thus, the viscosity of the solutions were obtained. Ten repetitions were made for each experimental group.

The wetting capacity measurements were made by the Draves method modified by PÉCORA et al.9: a 250 ml student beaker was filled with 200 ml of the liquid to be tested, leaving a 2 cm space from the border of the beaker to the surface of the solution. A 2-cm piece of thread (Corrente, 100% cotton) was then dropped from the border of the beaker, touching the surface of the liquid. The time spent for the thread to become completely wet and hit the bottom of the beaker was measured. Twenty repetitions for each solution were made.

The conductivity values were obtained by using an ohmmeter (Analion C-701).

All the measurements were made at 25 ºC.

Results

The results obtained are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Mean values of the physico-chemical properties of the NaClO solutions.
 
Property
Substance
0.5% NaClO
1.0% NaClO
2.5% NaClO
5.0% NaClO
Density (g/cm3)
1.00
1.04
1.06
1.09
Surface tension (dynes/cm)
74.3
75.0
75.7
73.8
pH
11.98
12.60
12.65
12.89
Viscosity (centipoise)
0.956
0.986
1.073
1.110
Wetting capacity (time)
2 hrs. 20 min.
1 hrs. 27 min.
1 hrs. 23 min.
18 min.
Conductivity (miliSiemens)
26.0
65.5
88.0
127.5

The density of the solutions changed in direct proportion to their concentration. The linear regression and correlation tests showed a direct relation between the results and a correlation at the level of 1.0%.

The results found for the surface tension indicate similar values for the NaClO solutions.

The pH test showed a direct relation between the solutions and correlation at the level of 1.0%.

Variance analysis showed significant statistical difference at 1% for the viscosity of the studied solutions.

The Tukey test showed that the solutions can be divided into 2 groups, with different values of viscosity. Group 1, formed by the 0.5% and 1.0% sodium hypochlorite solutions had the lowest viscosity values and group 2, formed by the 2.5% and 5.0% NaClO solutions had the highest.

The values for the wetting capacity of the tested solutions revealed that 1.0% and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solutions are statistically the same; 0.5% NaClO has a lower capacity to wet the thread, while 5.0% NaClO has the highest wetting capacity.

The conductivity test showed less resistance to the electrical current as the concentration of NaClO increased.

Discussion

Increased density of the studied solutions was proportional to the concentration, due to the higher mass of NaClO present in the more concentrated solutions.

The NaClO solutions showed surface tension values similar between them. These surface tension values are close of the value found for water (72.73 dynes/cm, PÉCORA et al.9). This can be undesirable, since a high surface tension can avoid the contact between the liquid and the surface.

Sodium hypochlorite solutions are alkaline and the higher their concentration, the higher will be the pH, due to the quantity of NaOH molecules present. The high pH values of sodium hypochlorite does not represent a disadvantage, since its action is limited to the surface of the tissue (ROSENFELD et al.11, THÉ et al.13).

The viscosity of the NaClO solutions increased with the NaClO concentration.

The wetting capacity of the solutions was dependent on the NaClO concentration, in a directly proportional relation (the shorter the time, the higher wetting capacity).

The conductivity of the studied solutions showed to be directly proportional to their concentrations. This can be explained by the number of available ions present in the media, higher in the more concentrated solutions.

Conclusions

Based on the methodology and the results obtained, it can be concluded that:

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

References

  1. BARRET MT: The Dakin-Carrel antiseptic solution. Dental Cosmos 59:04, 446-8, Apr. 1917.
  2. BAUMGARTNER JC, CUENIN PR: Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod 18:12, 605-12, Dez. 1992.
  3. COHEN S, BURNS RC: Pathways of the pulp. St. Louis: CV MOSBY, 6th Ed, 1994.
  4. DE DEUS QD: Endodontia. Rio de Janeiro, Medsi, 5ª Ed., 1992.
  5. GROSSMAN LI, MAIMAN BW: Dissolution of pulp tissue by chemical agentes. J Amer Dent Ass 28: 223-5, Feb. 1941.
  6. JOHNSON BR, REMEIKIS NA: Effective shelf-life of prepared sodium hypochlorite solution. J Endod 19:1, 40-3, Jan. 1993.
  7. LEONARDO MR, LEAL JM: Endodontia: Tratamento dos canais radiculares. 2ª Ed. Médica Panamericana, São Paulo, 1991.
  8. PÉCORA JD, GUERISOLI DMZ, SILVA RS, VANSAN LP: Shelf-life of 5% sodium hypochlorite solutions. Braz Endod J 2(1), 1997.
  9. PÉCORA JD, MURGEL CAF, COSTA WF, CAPRIGLIONI M, VANSAN LP: Capacidade de umectação dos tensoativos (aniônicos, catiônicos e anfóteros). Teste "in vitro". Rev Bras Odont 45, 22-5, 1988.
  10. PISKIN B, TÜRKÜN M: Stability of various sodium hypochlorite solutions. J of Endod v.21, n.5, p. 253-5, May 1995.
  11. ROSENFELD EF, JAMES GA, BUNKNER SB: Vital pulp response to sodium hypochlorite. J Endodon v. 4 n. 5, 140-6, May 1978.
  12. SHIH M, MARSHALL JF, ROSEN S: The bactericidal efficiency of sodium hypochlorite as an endodontc irrigant. Oral Surg 29(4):613-9, Apr. 1970.
  13. THÉ SD, MALTHA JC, PLASSCHAERT AJ: Reactions of guinea pig subcutaneous connective tissue following exposure to sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 49:5, 460-6, May 1980.